13.04.2019 Zweiter Brief gegen Anti-Terror Richtlinie

Vote on anti-terrorism directive next Wednesday

After the approval of the Committee on Internal Affairs (LIBE) and the vote in the trialogue negotiations, the controversial anti-terrorism directive will now be put to the vote in the EU Parliament next Wednesday. In February we wrote an open letter to the LIBE Committee together with other civil societies.

Our main criticisms were that

Probably out of "national interests", too, our second point of criticism has been addressed. According to the present text, only the national authorities may proceed to the providers domiciled there and they are entitled to appeal against these orders.

Our main criticism remained unheard. That is why we have now written again, this time to all Members of the European Parliament. Unfortunately we do not  expect Parliament to reject the directive, but at least we want to renew our criticism and hope that amendments will at least not reverse the text to its latter form.

Our letter reads

Brussels, 12 April 2019 

Dear Members of the European Parliament, 

We, the undersigned organisations, are writing to you ahead of the plenary vote on the Proposal on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online on Wednesday 17th April with an urgent concern which we would like to bring to your attention. We welcome the improvements the committees, and particularly the LIBE Committee have made to the initial text and we urge you to ​ reject any further Amendment which undermines those improvements​ . 

We regret, however, that ​ the adopted text still makes the untenable requirement to remove content within 1 hour from receipt of removal orders​ . Hosting service providers cooperate and work together with civil society and enforcement agencies to do their utmost at removing and preventing the dissemination of harmful and terrorist content. An inflexible and rigid provision, however, could have unintended consequences both on European users’ fundamental rights and on the Internet ecosystem. 

This extremely short deadline, coupled with onerous sanctions, would entail over-removal of lawful content which will negatively impact the freedom of expression and related fundamental rights of European users​ . Similar concerns have been expressed by the three UN Special Rapporteurs in their ​ joint opinion and by the ​ European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights​. 

Furthermore, the proposed timeframe does not take into account the size and economic capacity of hosting service providers. European small and medium-sized enterprises not operating a 24/7 service, for instance, would not be able to comply with removal orders being sent outside of working hours. Finally, there is no evidence to suggest that the 1-hour timeframe upon receipt of the removal order is appropriate or necessary to reduce the threat of terrorist content spreading online. 

We would, therefore, like to urge you to ​ vote in favour of a more pragmatic approach that would mandate hosting service providers to execute removal orders "as soon as possible", instead of in 1 hour​ 

Such an amendment would be compliant with European citizens’ fundamental rights and protect the competitiveness of digital businesses while ensuring a useful framework of cooperation between hosting service providers and Member States to tackle the dissemination of terrorist content online. 

Sincerely, 

Read more in the letter https://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/images/docs/201904JointLetterTerrorRegPlenary.pdf


Category[21]: Unsere Themen in der Presse Short-Link to this page: a-fsa.de/e/32o
Link to this page: https://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/de/articles/6851-20190413-zweiter-brief-gegen-anti-terror-richtlinie.htm
Link with Tor: http://a6pdp5vmmw4zm5tifrc3qo2pyz7mvnk4zzimpesnckvzinubzmioddad.onion/de/articles/6851-20190413-zweiter-brief-gegen-anti-terror-richtlinie.htm
Tags: #Grundrechte #Menschenrechte #Upload-Filter #Anti-Terror-Kampf #EU #Kommission #Parlament #Verordnung #Zensur #Transparenz #Informationsfreiheit #Anonymisierung #Meinungsmonopol #Meinungsfreiheit #Pressefreiheit #Internetsperren #Netzneutralität #Freizügigkeit #Unschuldsvermutung #Verhaltensänderung
Created: 2019-04-13 09:35:33


Kommentar abgeben

For further confidential communication, we recommend that you include a reference to a secure messenger, such as Session, Bitmessage, or similar, below the comment text.
To prevent the use of this form by spam robots, please enter the portrayed character set in the left picture below into the right field.

We in the Web2.0


Diaspora Mastodon Twitter Youtube Tumblr Flickr FsA Wikipedia Facebook Bitmessage FsA Song


Impressum  Privacy  Sitemap